.

NEWS AND VIEWS THAT IMPACT LIMITED CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT

"There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with
power to endanger the public liberty." - - - - John Adams

Monday, October 16, 2017

How the 17th Amendment Ruined the Senate


The Constitutional Convention

Direct Election of Senators
Government of, by and for the Oligarchs

  • The Constitution as created by Alexander Hamilton's Federalist Party was destroyed in 1913 by allowing the direct election of Senators by voters rather than by state legislatures.
  • Now Senators no longer represent their state. Instead they are little more that the bought and paid for tools of one or another unelected Oligarch Wall Street faction.
  • It is even worse in the House. Districts have grown so large and only millionaires or those accepting millions in special interest cash have any chance of getting elected.


(Tenth Amendment Center)  -  With the Graham-Cassidy healthcare bill to repeal Obamacare flaming out, not even getting a vote, one might wonder whether it was a lousy bill or if something else were amiss. As the bill seemed like pretty decent legislation, its failure to get a vote may be due to what the U.S. Senate has become. 

Today’s Senate is populated with careerists: professional politicians. Such politicians can be more attuned to the interests of their donors than to those of their constituents. . . . 

If you don’t like that your U.S. senators are breaking their promises to you, then you might start blaming yourself, because with the 17th Amendment in 1913 we started electing U.S. senators by popular vote. You, dear voter, have been sending the same people back to Congress year after year, to the point that we’ve actually had a senator or two whose age was in excess of 100. It’s as though the Senate were an episode of Survivor.
If you think that the 17th Amendment was a mistake that should be repealed, then you’re probably going to need to convene the states, as provided for by Article V, because there’s little chance that sitting congressmen are going to initiate an amendment to repeal the 17th. Good luck.
The original character of the Senate and the intent of the Founders was laid out in The Federalist in Nos. 62, 63, 64,65, 66, 75, and 76. In Federalist No. 62 we read:
In this spirit it may be remarked, that the equal vote allowed to each State is at once a constitutional recognition of the portion of sovereignty remaining in the individual States, and an instrument for preserving that residuary sovereignty. […]
Another advantage accruing from this ingredient in the constitution of the Senate is, the additional impediment it must prove against improper acts of legislation. No law or resolution can now be passed without the concurrence, first, of a majority of the people, and then, of a majority of the States.
So the House of Representatives is the People’s house, and the Senate is the house of “the several States.” But that was before the passage of the 17th Amendment, which changed the character of the Senate. Now, U.S. senators answer to the People, not their state legislatures. On Obamacare repeal, Sen. McCain is at odds with his State and its residents. 


Arizona has experienced Obamacare premium hikes of more than 100 percent, but Sen. McCain is more interested in “process,” “regular order,” and some ethereal bipartisanship (with the Hun, no less) than he is in getting a little relief to his constituents in Arizona.
Democrats often bemoan the money in politics. If U.S. senators were elected by state legislatures, wouldn’t there much less of a need for campaign money. The 17th Amendment was a mistake and should be repealed because it changed the character of the Senate. Senators are now “freelancers,” and don’t need to worry about the wrath of the voters until just before the next election. The U.S. Senate has become a club, and it’s a club that isn’t very responsive to the folks. Their job in life is first to raise money for their reelection campaigns, and second to make laws for the rest of us to live by, laws that don’t apply to U.S. senators.
The repeal of the 17th might also contain the right of state legislatures to recall their senators if they aren’t voting in the interests of their state. With such a recall mechanism, Sens. Collins and McCain could be relieved of their duties for their opposition to Graham-Cassidy by their state legislatures. In recent years, several states have been underrepresented because their senator had suffered an aneurysm, stroke, or brain cancer. But there’s no mechanism to replace them, so the state suffers. The 25th Amendment (Section 4) allows us to relieve of his duties a president who is “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office,” but we have no such avenue for incapacitated senators. Recall by state legislatures would also be useful for senators who are just too old, like Strom Thurmond.
If you’d like your state legislature to be able to ensure that you’re fully represented in the Senate by being able to recall and replace ailing senators, then you’ll most likely need to convene the states by way of Article V because sitting senators will likely never approve of such a thing. Good Luck.
There needs to be a great deal more turnover and churn in the Senate. For the last 104 years, since the ratification of the 17th Amendment, the low rate of turnover has been largely due to voters; they send the same people back to D.C. election after election. They do this because their senators “bring home the bacon,” and give them “free stuff.” But the Senate has become dysfunctional, swampy, and corrupt, (see Bob Menendez). Because the amendment avenue for fixing the Senate is so daunting, it is left to you, dear voter, to change that body. And the way to do that is to throw the careerist bums out in the caucuses and primaries.
In 1787, the Founders gave us a stable, sound, and solid system, but the tinkering and tweaks since haven’t always improved that system. By not even proceeding to debate on Graham-Cassidy, it may be time to retire this description of the U.S. Senate: “The world’s greatest deliberative body.”
Read More . . . .



3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Look ...
popular vote are still the best ...
on donor Money ... thats a false assumption ...
if you a sound person , you reject that "quid pro quo" that you said might happen in the current system ...
look ...
even Democrat Hillary shum away Wienstein Money to charities ...
so !!!
the system might work ...
i`m more worried about foreign Money that allow TRAITOR Trump to sit in the House ...the White one ...
and State legislators need donors to be elected to by the any State people ...
the problemn is in the wide core circle of all local parties , that need a democratic system to elected a representer ... they must abide by the needs of all those suporters if they want their vote next time ... but they got the choice to catch votes by doing a campaign on ideias that bring people in ... not for jobs , but by ideals ...
if you don`t got that democratic system , like communists or left wingers , or nazis , you only need the trust of the inner core of the party to be NAMED ... the central bureau ... those followers down in the local party system , as slaves , only watch what may happen to then as employers of the Party , or Storm Troppers as the Cheka , NKVD , Khmers Rouge executioners , or the SS or SA ...a pyramidal scheme of power
so ... the direct vote by the people , donor , no donor , or internet donor ( as Bama ) are surely the best democratic system to elect a representer of the people ...
mark this works ...
go always by free choice from parties of all sorts ... and direct vote by the people ...
someday people realize that supersize passion on life , is common sense on family , and sports , than in politics ... fanaticism is a bad road to follow ...

Anonymous said...

at a top level you even can take a whole country in a total subversion of Law State ... we got a prime minister indicted for it , colluding with a big Money conglomerate , and other businesses , and he was elected freely by the voters ...
as if someone tell that Hitler as elected too ... or Maduro .. Chavez ... or others that try and achieve to subvert the democracy , separation of powers , and the Law State ...
they all are elected and then , from inside the system , they grab the absolute power of a despotic ruler ...
even more easy we saw in other organizations , from cultural associations, sport ones , or cities ...

Anonymous said...

so "theres is danger from all men .The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty " ... John Adams ...

follow ?